2001/01 : Heiser gives his critique on full disclosure.
"The concept of full disclosure is, indeed, ambiguous, serving as a
politically correct shield behind which all manner of self-serving behavior
can be justified." (p. 2)Read more
2000/10/09 : Lemos give his point of view on vulnerability disclosure debate.
"While Ranum is well-known in the industry for his black-and-white views on disclosure, most security professionals fall into a grey area."
This artefact is part of...Read more
2000 : The authors explain their view pro full disclosure and its aim of educating people. They add their opinion on the bad sides of full disclosure.
"The only rational solution is to make the script kiddies responsible for their actions, as we do with all criminals...Read more
2002/04/08 : Arne Vidstrom points a list of the pros, cons and fake arguments on full disclosure of vulnerabilities.
This artifact is part of the Culp debate Bundle.Read more
2005 : "Part One of this paper explains the current state of computer (in)security and sets forth three ways to restrict publications followed by the most common arguments for and against. It then illustrates the popularity of security publication restrictions with an ...Read more
2001 : "A group of black-hat hackers, in a campaign called "Project Mayhem," have declared war on white-hat hackers who've gone to work for security firms."
The 'Project Mayhem' is the battle declaration of full-disclosure against anti-sec.Read more
1999/11 : Marcus Ranum and Jeremy Rausch wrote both on this special issue on Security. Did Jeremy Rausch wrote to respond to Ranum’s article? The two article side-by-bside seems an editorial choice, was it an order of the journal ?
Between 1999...Read more
2005/12/07 : Andrew Cencini, Kevin Yu, Tony Chan write upon the different choices of vulnerability disclosures.
"When a software vulnerability is discovered by a third party, the complex question of who, what...Read more