"[...]this chapter touches three issues: 1) it responds to some of the issues raised by Fabian concerning the status of eth- nographic materials and data, and of commentary as a “genre” of ethnographic writing after the Internet; 2) it distinguishes conceptually the practices of coordi- nation and collaboration as they relate to ethnographic fieldwork after the Inter- net; and 3) it reports briefly on the outcome of the Ethics and Politics of Science and Technology projects [...]"
"
Source
Kelty M. C. 2008, “Collaboration, Coordination, and Composition: Fieldwork after the Internet,”Fieldwork isn't what it used to be, ed. James Faubion and George Marcus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Critical Commentary
"[...]this chapter touches three issues: 1) it responds to some of the issues raised by Fabian concerning the status of eth- nographic materials and data, and of commentary as a “genre” of ethnographic writing after the Internet; 2) it distinguishes conceptually the practices of coordi- nation and collaboration as they relate to ethnographic fieldwork after the Inter- net; and 3) it reports briefly on the outcome of the Ethics and Politics of Science and Technology projects [...]"
"